Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Scott Brown’

With all the double speak, and Washington rhetoric, I thought I would put my interpreting skills to use to decipher some of the latest and greatest quotes coming form our latest and greatest leader’s.  Yes I am fluent in liberal, so these are extremely accurate translations:

Sen. Barbara Mikulski, D-Md:

 ”Economy, economy, economy”

Translation:  Raising taxes on citizens and businesses, more government control/take over of private companies, re-distribution of wealth and more government programs.

 Sen. Bob Casey, D-Pa.

“We need a jobs bill. We need short-term, focused strategies to create jobs, real fast,” “If the dominant message isn’t about jobs and spending, we’ll be making a difficult challenge exponentially more difficult.”

Translation:  We need to spend more money.  We need another stimulus package, with some benefits starting a year or two after we implement the stimulus.  We can use fabricated numbers again and lie about the jobs created, and change our original wording from “jobs created” to “jobs saved”.  Just like we did here.

Obama:

“The same thing that swept Scott Brown into office swept me into office. People are angry, and they’re frustrated. Not just because of what’s happened in the last year or two years, but what’s happened over the last eight years,” Obama told ABC in an interview.

Translation:  The same thing that swept Scott Brown into office swept me into office. People are angry, and they’re frustrated. I should also add that in addition to the anger and frustration, there were plenty of lies I told:   I promised we would be a transparent administration, I would be bipartisan in my efforts, I would leave old Washington politics behind, I will be in charge of an administration that will promote unity.  I must admit that my time as president brought the country even further apart.  This is why I must continue to blame the Bush administration for my failures and broken promises, I am like every other politician, I can not, and will not take responsibility for my failures.  No, I will abdicate it, and blame Bush.  That’s what we do.  Also, let’s be completely honest.  If American Idol wasn’t on now, and Coakley was just a little bit more of an exciting candidate, a lot of the people watching American Idol would have come out to vote for her.  They didn’t feel like they were going to be “a part of something big!”  There was no need for the hippies to be involved in the Massachusetts election.

AxelRod: 

“It’s not an option to walk away from a problem that is only going to get worse”

Translation:  We can’t say “ObamaCare is dead, we need to present a front, even if there are plenty of Senator’s and those in the Congress that are running as far as they can from Health Care Reform now.  It doesn’t matter at all that Pelosi says she doesn’t have the votes for it.  Never mind that the majority of the US citizens are against the bill as well, we have never been one to listen to the people, we have an agenda to pass, and that is what is important! 

Obama:

In a year of hopping from crisis to crisis, he told ABC News, “we lost some of that sense of speaking directly to the American people about what their core values are and why we have to make sure those institutions are matching up with those values.”

Translation:  In a year of hopping from crisis to crisis, we have talked directly to the American people, in fact we have talked to them more times on national TV than any other President, all with in my first year.  I could really care less about any of the core values of Americans.  Yes, I know that the majority of them dislike Democrats ideas for Health Care Reform, but like my main man AxelRod said in the paragraph above ”we have an agenda to pass.”

Al Fraken:

 “one way or the other” a health care reform bill will pass Congress.”

Translation:  Since we have no chance of passing health care in a legitimate and bipartisan fashion, we will do it ”the other way”.  RAM IT DOWN YOUR THROATS AMERICA.  We’ve got three choices. 1)  We can pass the bill quick before Brown is seated, 2) We can approve the senate version of the bill, of course the House would have to vote on this, and that is unlikely to pass, 3)  reconciliation, the nuclear option, we would only need 50 votes for this option. 

Sorry Al, You are just blowing smoke.  Very unlikely any of those will be implimented.  Try it.  I hope you are prepared for the anger of the American people.  Which is already burning bright, this will add more fuel for the fire.  

I hope the translations have been informative and entertaining for you.  Good night.

Read Full Post »

There has so much that has gone on in this past week, instead of a long article, I though I would summarize a few things:

1) The Obama tax on Big Banks is bad for us. Yes you heard it from me. These big bad old evil banks, that will be taxed for taking tarp money (note that most have already paid it back with interest) is going to hurt us more than it hurts the banks. Why you ask? Because the banks aren’t going to lose their profit line, they are going to pass that tax on down to us: the consumers. So yet again The Big O has raised taxes on us, by claiming to raise it on the Big old Evil Banks. Prepare to be raped by your bank.

2) The health care bill IS NOT DEAD yet. While The Big O and Harry Reid promise to seat Scott Brown as quickly as possible, this does not prevent Harry Reid by going through with a Nuclear Option Vote which will pass the senate with a 51 vote majority. While the Republicans now technically have enough votes to force a filibuster, those like Olympia Snowe have been tempted to sway over to the Democratic side. Therefore the fight continues for now. Do not for an instant, believe it’s over, because until the bum’s are voted out, it still has a chance to pass.

3) Howard Dean and Barrack Obama have declared the only reason that Scott Brown won in Mass. is because the voters were mad at Bush, and mad at Congress for not being liberal enough. You got it. The Big O say the voters were mad at Bush and thus voted for someone closer to Bush than the opponent Coakley and Howard Dean declares the voters voted for Republican Brown because Congress wasn’t liberal enough. Yep these whack jobs are running and speaking for our country and trying to explain why Scott Brown won. I guess it didn’t have anything to do with cutting taxes, creating jobs, opposing Health Care or Obama’s course of steering the country towards socialism and spending like a drunken sailor.

4) The Supreme Court has ruled that corporations shall not be limited for spending money for or opposing Political Campaigns. This means that free speech is open for all. I think it’s a good thing, because for far too long, corporations have had no say to respond to the demonization that liberalism has attacked them for. Remember corporations create jobs, not Obama. If corporations are taxed heavily enough, they will pick up and leave this country and take the jobs with them. Now Corporations have the ability to challenge the government out in the realm of public perception. I wouldn’t be surprised if Bank’s start to run ad’s targeting Obama tomorrow.

I’m sure more things will come down the line soon, but I felt that these points needed consideration and not be overlooked so we are not lulled into a false sense of security with this government.

Read Full Post »

Really?!

I'm as shocked as you, Kyle.

January 21, 2010: Jobless claims “unexpectedly” rise.

January 14, 201o: Retail sales drop “unexpectedly”.

December 10, 2009: Jobless claims “unexpectedly” rise.

October 28, 2009: New home sales “unexpectedly tumble.

October 2, 2009: Jobless claims rose “higher than forecast”.

August 20, 2009: Jobless claims “unexpectedly” rise.

June 25, 2009: Jobless claims “unexpectedly” rise.

And now for a flashback:

Newsweek (Feb 5, 2009): GOP says stimulus can’t create jobs.  They’re wrong.

ABC (June 8, 2009): White House claims stimulus will save or create 600,000 jobs in the next 100 days.

B. Hussein Obama (January 22, 2009): I won.

It looks to me like the only ones who are surprised to find the stimulus’ inability to “create” – or even “save” jobs are people who bought into the whole Obamanaut theory to begin with.

Let’s be honest for a minute, folks…  this is bad.  As Ed Morrissey over at HotAir and Glenn Reynolds over at Instapundit are both saying, even if this is from an “administrative accumulation”, it’s still a sign that the economy is far from recovery, and it’s quite possible that December’s retail numbers were much worse than predicted.  The Dow Jones is up, sure…  but not because the economy is strong.  The value of the Dow Jones is up because the value on which the Dow Jones is based is worth less than it was before the recession.  There’s an inverse correlation between the increase in the Dow and the value of the dollar that’s been in place since Bush’s stimulus back in October.

In other words: it’s not a recovery.  Jobs aren’t being created, which means people aren’t buying things, which means that it’s harder for companies to stay open and employ people and pay their bills.

And what is Obama’s response?  It’s the 21st century equivalent of “Let them eat cake”…   “tax them“…  because ,obviously, when people and businesses are having trouble making ends meet, the best idea is to take even more money away from them.

I guess that’s what makes all the economic news so “unexpected”.  It’s the same thing makes Scott Brown’s victory in Massachusetts “shocking”.  It’s a concept that’s best summed up by Adam Savage from “Mythbusters”: they reject reality and substitute their own.

Here’s hoping they’ll be just as shocked and surprised when they get tossed out of Washington on their flabby butts.

Read Full Post »

From Drive By News: Scott Brown wins in Massachusetts. In other news, Horsemen are seen galloping across the sky and a bearded Jewish man with holes in his hands and feet is seen descending through the clouds.

Liberals and Democrats are rushing to identify the man, but as of yet have had little success.

Read Full Post »

Scott Brown Campaigns Day Before US Senate Special Election

Andy Borowitz, the latest liberal to spew forth a masterpiece, like this:

BOSTON (The Borowitz Report) – Firing up voters on the eve of the special election to fill the late Edward M. Kennedy’s Senate seat, Republican candidate Scott Brown spoke at a campaign rally today, proclaiming, “With your help, our dream of depriving millions of health care is within reach.”

“Let’s send a message, Massachusetts!” Mr. Brown exhorted the crowd. “Let’s tell people across the country that if they want health coverage, they are sh#t out of luck!”

An aide to Mr. Brown said that internal polling reveals that the Republican’s anti-healthcare message may be catching on: “Right now, Scott is showing a double-digit lead among people who describe themselves as douchebags.”

There it is, completely unedited except for one word.  What is happening really is remarkable.  Ted Kennedy’s long-held seat might go to a Republican, and not only that, this could be the deciding factor in Obama care. 

What Mr. Borowitz says in his short little rant is a good index to show where the Progressive movement is at this very moment.  It is sad that most liberals probably really do believe conservatives are trying to achieve this:  “ With your help, our dream of depriving millions of health care is within reach”  Most sane people don’t buy into this.  All of the polls have shown the decline for Obama care, these people, and myself included don’t want to exclude anyone the opportunity for healthcare.  The point that the majority of americans oppose National Health Care is for these reasons:  the cost, raising taxes, maintaining the quality of care, passing on enormous debt to our children, public funding for abortions,  plus many other concerns. 

There are better options out there.  The majority of Americans are figuring this out.  The citizens of Massachusetts certainly are.  Republicans have some good answers as an alternative , it’s certainly not exhaustive, and doesn’t offer every answer, but it’s a start to get it done right and effectively. 

Anyway,  my point is that if you are a completely dense and believe that Republicans want to deprive people of health care, there is no help for you.  You belong to the group of the minority of Americans who feel this way.  I know that it appears to be much more than a minority, but when you have the media pushing the progressive agenda, it does create the effect that you’ve got the whole country believing this nonsense.   

My last point on this article is this. If you don’t fall inline with liberal agenda, you get to be called a whole host of names.  These names are quite descriptive, and show how low Liberals are willing to go to.  One of the latest is Teabagger’s.  This term is used to describe the thousands of americans that attended recent Tea Parties.  Republicans and Democrats.  Yes, the term does carry an explicit/sexual meaning behind it.  It was and is used by many member’s of the media, bloggers, and other’s.  Another term used to describe Tea Party attendees was “angry mob”, and yes they were angry.  Especially the elderly.     

The latest term sure to catch on, is written by Mr. Borowitz:   “Right now, Scott is showing a double-digit lead among people who describe themselves as douchebags.”  At least he is acknowledging the lead Brown has, and thank you for the kind words Andy.  I am sure that there are plenty of people from Massachusetts included in the “douchebags” that are not Republicans. 

My point in all this is:  can you see how compassionate the  progressives/liberals/Democrats are?  Don’t liberals pride themselves on their hippie ways?  Love everyone, blah blah blah…….  Can you see how desperate they are.  I really couldn’t have addressed a more insignificant blog.   I did so to show more of the liberal way of doing things and their typical reaction to defeat.  It really hits them hard when their agenda is being threatened.  Especially with polls like these.  They really resort to some shameful tactics.   Thanks for showing us your true colors liberals, again.  Thank you Andy for saying what so many other’s who share your view likely also think.  It will no doubt push more independents away from your party.

Read Full Post »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.